Eigenpie (mLRT) Review
Isolated per-LST restaking, little else documented
of 10
Eigenpie offers isolated liquid restaking — a separate value-accruing token such as egETH per underlying LST, to ring-fence each asset's risk — restaked through operators on EigenLayer. Beyond that structure, its fee, withdrawal terms, licence and audits could not be verified.
No money changes hands. This is a non-commercial project: no advertising, no sponsored placements, and no affiliate or referral links. Links to the services below earn us nothing. Every overall score is the plain average of the criteria shown on the page, so you can check the arithmetic yourself — see our rating methodology and how the site is funded.
Model
Isolated liquid restaking, one mLRT per LST
Receipt token
egETH and others, value-accruing
Restaked into
EigenLayer, via node operators, to support AVSs
Fee / withdrawal / audits
Not stated
Licence
Unverifiable — no public repository located
Scores
Each criterion carries equal weight. The overall score is the average of these 5 scores — (2.0 + 3.0 + 2.0 + 1.0 + 2.0) ÷ 5 = 2.0.
Pros
- Isolated restaking model documented: a separate mLRT per LST, isolating each asset's risk
- egETH is value-accruing, using an underlying share system that appreciates against ETH
- Restakes through node operators on EigenLayer to support AVSs
Cons
- No fee percentage is stated on the fetched pages
- Slashing conditions and any insurance are not stated
- Withdrawal terms — unbonding period and any exit fee — are not detailed
- No official public contracts repository could be located, so the licence is unverifiable
- No audits are named on the fetched pages
A genuinely distinct design
Eigenpie's idea is isolation: rather than one basket token, it issues a separate mLRT for each underlying liquid staking token — egETH, mstETH and others — so the risk tied to any one LST is ring-fenced from the rest. Each is value-accruing on a share system, restaked through operators on EigenLayer to support AVSs. As a design it is the most differentiated in this comparison.
Almost nothing else could be verified
The fetched introduction page carried no fee percentage, no slashing detail, no withdrawal terms and no named audit, and no official public contracts repository could be located to read a licence. For a restaking product, the slashing and fee disclosures are the two most important, and neither could be confirmed.
This entry sits at the bottom of the ranking on the absence of readable documentation rather than any negative finding. If Eigenpie publishes these facts where we did not reach, the review will be completed against the source; the pages we used are listed below.
How it compares
Karak
Nine-day withdrawal with a slashing window, docs blocked
EigenLayer
The restaking layer itself, opt-in slashing stated
Symbiotic
Twelve named auditors and a stated risk framework
Swell Restaking (rswETH)
Value-accruing rswETH, no licence file
Kelp DAO (rsETH)
10% fee and a delayed-open licence
ether.fi (eETH / weETH)
MIT-licensed, three-way reward split published
YieldNest (ynETH)
BSD-licensed with slashing stated plainly
Mellow
Six named auditors on a Symbiotic-and-EigenLayer vault
Renzo (ezETH)
Fee split and withdrawal delays published in full
Sources
Scored from published primary sources rather than hands-on use. Every figure above comes from one of the pages below, on the date shown. Manufacturers change prices and specifications without notice — if something here no longer matches the source, tell us and we will correct it.
Frequently asked questions
What is isolated liquid restaking?
Eigenpie issues a separate restaking token for each underlying liquid staking token, so the risk tied to one asset is isolated from the others.
What does Eigenpie charge?
No fee percentage was stated on the pages we could fetch on 24 July 2026.
Nothing here is financial advice. Editorial policy · How we score · How we're funded.