Skip to content

Uniswap Review

Published tiers and genuinely immutable core

of 10

Uniswap publishes its fee tiers plainly — 0.30% flat on v2, 0.05%/0.30%/1% on v3, freely settable on v4 — and states that core contracts cannot be upgraded, paused or reversed. Its licence is weaker than its documentation claims.

No money changes hands. This is a non-commercial project: no advertising, no sponsored placements, and no affiliate or referral links. Links to the services below earn us nothing. Every overall score is the plain average of the criteria shown on the page, so you can check the arithmetic yourself — see our rating methodology and how the site is funded.

v2 fee

0.30% flat

v3 fee tiers

0.05%, 0.30%, 1%

v4 fee

Settable 0% to 100% by pool creator

Licence

BUSL-1.1 plus MIT per file; change date 2027-06-15 to MIT

Immutability

Core not upgradeable, cannot be paused or reversed

Scores

Fee transparency
10.0
Licence & code openness
5.0
Immutability & governance
10.0
Chain coverage
10.0
Audit disclosure
9.0

Each criterion carries equal weight. The overall score is the average of these 5 scores — (10.0 + 5.0 + 10.0 + 10.0 + 9.0) ÷ 5 = 8.8.

Pros

  • v3 tiers published as 0.05%, 0.30% and 1%; v2 a flat 0.30%
  • Core contracts stated to be non-upgradeable, unpausable and non-reversible
  • Deployed across 24 networks per official deployment docs
  • Audits published as PDFs from OpenZeppelin and Trail of Bits

Cons

  • v4-core ships under Business Source License 1.1, which is not an open-source licence
  • User documentation describes the protocol as open-source and GPL-licensed, contradicting the licence files
  • v4 lets pool creators set any fee from 0% to 100%, so the tier guarantee does not carry over

The immutability claim is unusually strong

Uniswap states that once deployed, core contracts are not upgradeable, that no party can pause them, reverse trade execution or change protocol behaviour retroactively. Most protocols in this comparison say nothing at all on the subject, and a few admit that parts remain upgradeable. This is the clearest position published by anyone here.

A contradiction worth naming

Uniswap's own developer documentation describes the protocol as open-source and GPL-licensed. The v4-core repository ships a Business Source License 1.1 file naming Universal Navigation Inc. as licensor, converting to MIT no later than 15 June 2027. BUSL is a delayed-open licence, not an open-source one. We score the licence file, not the description of it, which is why this criterion sits well below the others.

Fees are clear, until v4

The v2 and v3 tiers are unambiguous. In v4, pool creators may set any fee from 0% to 100% in 0.0001% increments, so the protocol-level guarantee a trader could previously rely on becomes a per-pool question.

How it compares

Sources

Scored from published primary sources rather than hands-on use. Every figure above comes from one of the pages below, on the date shown. Manufacturers change prices and specifications without notice — if something here no longer matches the source, tell us and we will correct it.

  1. 1.Uniswap — fee documentation — checked
  2. 2.Uniswap v4-core — BUSL licence file — checked
  3. 3.Uniswap — how Uniswap works (immutability claim) — checked
  4. 4.Uniswap v4 — deployment addresses — checked

Frequently asked questions

What are Uniswap's fees?

Uniswap publishes 0.30% flat on v2 and tiers of 0.05%, 0.30% and 1% on v3. In v4 pool creators can set any fee from 0% to 100%.

Is Uniswap open source?

The v4-core repository ships under Business Source License 1.1, which is not an open-source licence, converting to MIT by 15 June 2027 — although Uniswap's own user docs describe the protocol as GPL-licensed.

Nothing here is financial advice. Editorial policy · How we score · How we're funded.